|
|
|
|
|
|
by Dylan16807
2729 days ago
|
|
|
Not really. There doesn't need to be a "cap". You can tax every single ton of net carbon. Traditional cap-and-trade has a very valid criticism that it doesn't fix the problem, only limits it slightly and moves it around. If you add carbon-removers into the equation, and set things up to have 0 or even negative carbon per year, and then you actually do fix the problem. |
|
|