|
|
|
|
|
by mrestko
2716 days ago
|
|
This goes back to the central thesis of the article: that interference from non-physicians (i.e. insurers, billers) are destroying the usefulness of notes. Physicians are bound by both a professional duty and oath as well as legal liability to keep your medical information in the strictest of confidence. But it is nearly impossible to know in advance when a particular piece of medical information will become important for the treatment of a patient. Hiding it because of concerns about insurance or employment is not a solution--it's an indication that insurance and employment have undue influence on or access to a professional record. |
|
Your medical record is meant to be a confidential record read only by those who are sworn to care for and protect you, and by nobody else for no other purpose.
As a student doctor it's alarming to think that people do not feel they can trust their doctor with their medical history. I wonder if this is particularly a problem with the US healthcare system.