[orf]

Sacrificing the awesome 3.x features (f-strings, typing, metaclasses, object model improvements) to hold onto a deprecated and soon-to-be obsolete version of Python seems bad to me.

IMO make a clean cut else it will never end.

[beagle3]

Python 1 already had metaclasses (I remebmer it as "the Don Beaudry hack" or "the Don Beaudry hook", depended on who you asked)

Are Python 3 metaclasses a significant change?

[0] https://www.python.org/doc/essays/metaclasses/

[orf]

There are a number of improvements, including how you define them and the things you can do with them. Some of these tie in with other language features, e.g typing.NamedTuple[1].

There is also PEP 487[2], which means you can do more without needing a metaclass.

1. https://docs.python.org/3/library/typing.html#typing.NamedTu...

2. https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0487/