|
|
|
|
|
by harunurhan
2720 days ago
|
|
I have worked with polyrepo madness... I do remember doing commits to up to 5 different repos just for a feature. And to roll this feature to prod, few of these repos had to go through release process. On top of everything we couldn't really write tests to ensure if the feature works. The best we could do is write tests on the "user facing" repo and keep fixing and releasing others until those pass. Well, I am sure many companies doing better than we did, with poly repos though. |
|
Polyrepo = each application in its own repo
Whatever-madness-you-had-repo = each application across multiple repos
I'm sorry to hear you had to suffer what you did, but that was not the only alternative to a monorepo!