[AnimalMuppet]

There is (probably) a definition of "think" where neural networks actually thing. There is also (probably) a definition of "think" where neural networks don't actually think. There are articles advocating both positions, and neither side explicitly states their definition of "think". So they're really arguing about what the right definition is, but in disguise, since neither side states their definition, nor gives reasons why that definition is better than the other side's. As a result, the "discussion" is pretty much useless.