|
|
|
|
|
by pasbesoin
2733 days ago
|
|
Yep. Midwest metropolis (out in the suburbs, but still fairly dense). It's the rust. Well, and in a few Chrystlers and a Ford I've been familiar with, the trannie. Kind of a race between the two factors. Right now, I have an older Subaru that would be good for at least a few more years, except the rust has compromised the gas tank. And dropping that means dropping the drive train. And you can get it back together -- but how many parts do you end up having to replace, because the rust has gotten to them too badly. And then you're closing in on the value of the car. If/when we switch to composites (and/or aluminum), with an electric drive train maybe localized at the four wheels, or at least "compartmentalized" and swap-able (1), then maybe the rust factor and overall longevity will improve. Maybe... I'm waiting to see what creative means corrosion demonstrates to further its entropy under this scenario. -- 1. And for the record, I'd still prefer a "hybrid" design with backup on-board generation from some type of chemical fuel, at least until electric penetration is thorough and cold-weather capacity is secured. |
|
[1] https://www.engineering.com/AdvancedManufacturing/ArticleID/...