|
|
|
|
|
|
by jonex
2732 days ago
|
|
|
That assumes that compilation times is a number one prio for all users. Halving compilation times certainly is worth something, but the cost will have to compare well to other options of reducing compilation times such as using distributed builds etc. In the end it's really hard to force breaking changes for systems that are working sufficiently well. If I have something that I'm satisfied with (after all, I chose to use C++ over Go, c#, D, Ada, Pascal, etc., why not choose C++17 over some hypothethical incompatible C++22) |
|
|