[xerxe-sans-s]

Your first argument discounted psychological studies primarily on the basis that there are two many dimensions to account for in relation to a measurement of behavior.

You then went on to suggest a link between gender identification and the results of a study on a single variable. It’s probably the case there are many environmental and physical dimensions at play with gender identity. While I can’t say at this point that your link is wrong, it may be best to hold back on the last assumptions; especially a biologically based one, given the scope of the impact.

[Godel_unicode]

You're literally replying to a comment which makes this exact point.

> Well, we can introduce a protocol, and study it, and know conclusively in perhaps 10 years. But, between then and now...