[PavlovsCat]

> So, where's this new generation? What demonstrates their love? Show me pictures of a dozen, or it didn't happen.

That's the point of the comment. "Nuclear had it's chance" is what you latched onto, concluding with "The environmentalist not rationality kille nuclear". So I guess you agree, the title is BS.

[ThomPete]

I don't care about the title. I care about the claim that nuclear had it's chance which anyone who knows their history know isn't true whatso ever.

Again solar has 1% of the worlds energy covered that's it. This is with all the bells and whistle and political support and economic investments.

Nuclear will EVEN without that deliver way more energy, much more stable, in abundance form and scaleable plus it's safe and greener than even solar.

Claiming it had it's time is ideologically blind in a way only people who listen too much to politicians like to think.

Call me when sun is used for most of the tranportation industry and for large constructions etc. Call me when the poor countries can solve the problems nature provides via solar.