|
|
|
|
|
by timthorn
2730 days ago
|
|
> need for the card issuer to provide protection is not as necessary It is a legal responsibility upon the issuer, rather than a discretionary benefit. It is particularly beneficial when a retailer goes out of business; an undelivered or broken order will be refunded, whereas if the bill was paid by debit card you'd just be considered a creditor. |
|