|
|
|
|
|
by benj111
2726 days ago
|
|
'gold' coins can and were debased. So theres a legitimate fear of nations minting coins with lower gold content but the same face value. Devaluing your own coin with it (if people cant differentiate). Also if I'm a European cotton trader, do I want to be left with north US currency if the south won, and visa versa? So yes the gold itself has a value, but as the article itself shows, currency without backing has value. With that in mind, I would prefer to see a comparison to an independent currency. |
|
That's why paper money was issued: it was outside of the purview of the Mint and not subject to the legal restrictions on debasement. Referencing [2] again, we can see that at the height of the war in 1864 the market price of gold rose from its statutory price of $20.67 to $47.02 (which, due to the effective disappearance of hard currency from ordinary commerce, would have been relative to the paper currency). In other terms, each Gold Dollar was effectively worth $2.27 in Greenbacks or each Greenback could only buy 44% of a Gold Dollar. That matches up pretty closely with the figure cited in the linked article.
If you were a foreign person holding US gold coins in the Civil War era you could sell those gold coins for their gold content (whose value matched their pre-war face value exactly) even if the US government collapsed. You could not do the same with US paper currency.
[1]https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/1094
[2]http://onlygold.com/Info/Historical-Gold-Prices.asp
[3]https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coinage_Act_of_1834