|
|
|
|
|
by benj111
2726 days ago
|
|
In the Somalian example the 'token' already has an established price, so all the parties can go on as before. Its unclear to me that you could just introduce tokens and have everyone accept the exchange rate. That's the trick, I will only accept tokenX because I know I can by Y eggs and 0.Z of a cow. I don't know the same about TokenA. You could jump start TokenA by giving it the states backing (taxation etc), and it could probably coast just like TokenX for a while though. |
|
So the emergence of TokenA is that someone promises that it's worth some value and that the promise made is trusted by enough people.
If you enjoy a good read, I'd suggest you check out Going Postal and Making Money by Terry Pratchett, they discuss (among much hilarity) the emergence of a postal system and stamp trading, along with the eventual evolution into paper money. There are certainly better academic papers about the technical side but I honestly think those two novels make a much more compelling case because you are given a narrative where people start accepting a fiat currency and everyone is doing so for perfectly logical reasons.