|
|
|
|
|
by ZoomZoomZoom
2730 days ago
|
|
I may be going on a limb here, but I have a sense of the same broken logic here as the ubiquitous argument of lost revenue[1]. To be clear, I don't argue the point of suppression and cultural standards affecting the scientific (or, not specifically, any other) thought, but using such simplistic way to quantify that effect. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lost_sales |
|
Denying half (or even more than half) of your citizens access to education and more prestigious stem jobs means you are tossing away an Einstein or a Bohr once every generation or so. The cumulative costs of that are enormous, and are compounding, compared to that a couple of $ of money that does not end up in the pockets of media moguls is very small potatoes.