Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by kbsletten 2735 days ago
From the article, the artists claim that they were approached by a firm to buy the copyright to the tattoos for a clothing line and then once the deal was done, the firm went after 2K, they say they didn't actually intend for this to happen, and they don't own the copyright anymore.
1 comments

So basically the firm acted really scummy, and probably intended to go after 2k the entire time, but sold it to the artists as 'clothing line'...Is anyone really surprised?