|
|
|
|
|
by burfog
2741 days ago
|
|
Well, unvote them, because this makes no sense: "He could not have ever exfiltrated that data to begin with as he gave the drive back" Think about it. The USB device was for transferring data to something else. That might have been a personal device with a cellular data plan. Sure, he gave back the USB drive. He didn't physically take that to China, or intend to do so. Those files were on it for a reason though, and that reason is transferring them to something that gets the data to China. |
|
The entire point of the comment I made (which you replied to) is not that baybal2 is correct (in fact, I have no idea/opinion of whether they are correct about the defendent being innocent). The point is that ad hominem attacks through downvotes are a bad thing.