|
|
|
|
|
by wildmusings
2742 days ago
|
|
>The point I want to convey is that if he could've done anything with it (like copying files somewhere else,) he had no point of ever attempting to do any trickery (giving a USB stick with erased files) invariably of circumstances and technicalities. “The perfect crook would have covered his tracks better” is not persuasive. The perfect crook wouldn’t get caught. People who do bad things are just as fallible as people who don’t. |
|
If he did not commit a crime, would he not do so, and this be the most normal thing he can do?
The answer is yes
Now there is no distinction in between a normal employee leaving the company and a criminal following your logic.
Every time I see people going for such argument, I almost feel my sight getting dark, but people who can shove such line of thought into a legal argument in a criminal case are found left and right in the West.
I would've liked to put much stronger terms here.