|
|
|
|
|
|
by RA_Fisher
2744 days ago
|
|
|
If the doctor was doing good work, they should have no issue defending the work in a civil trial. Of course that's costly, but then again we have given a state-granted monopoly to lawyers: private bar associations that grant access to courts. |
|
|
Waiting five years for it to go to any kind of trial and then potentially being found guilty anyway because the jury sees an evil insurance corporation and an evil for-profit corporation and an evil, manipulative doctor trying to further his own career...
You’re going to lose anyway, and in the intervening 5 years you’re unemployable... and no matter how the trial turns out you’re also unemployable. That’s a lose-lose, and that’s why they always settle.