[xyzzy123]

Relatively weaker regulation (coupled with need!) allowed a doctor to deploy an unapproved pediatric device. You might get away with this once or twice but if you were a company making this thing in the west you would get rightfully sued into a smoking crater.

I think the fallacy in your reasoning is to assume that innovation is “proportional” to death rate somehow. Doing it cheaper (or even at all!) under the constraints you have is still innovation. Put another way I think we have different definitions of innovation. The way I think of it, equivalent outcome for way less cost still counts.