|
|
|
|
|
|
by cat199
2742 days ago
|
|
|
you're assuming he's telling the truth.. more likely: - policy exists for drivers own packages or is poorly checked so that other packages can be returned for the $$ even though they are not that drivers - thief is using loophole/lack of oversight in policy possibly along with feigned ignorance to make this excuse to make the theft seem like an accident |
|
|