[chronotis]

This was what was particularly interesting to me - that they went to the effort of writing a purely technical article on the particulars of how parts of their environment operate, and to publish it on their platform even when that's not the sort of content they're known for.

[viraptor]

It's not their main platform though:

> Digital Blog

> A blog by the Guardian's internal Digital team. We build the Guardian website, mobile apps, Editorial tools, revenue products, support our infrastructure and manage all things tech around the Guardian

[wftglf]

Hi! Thanks for your comments. I'm one of the authors of this post. It is the same platform at the moment (just not tagged with editorial tags so it stays away from the fronts), though sometimes the team that approves non-editorial posts to the site can be concerned about us writing about outages and things as it might carry a 'reputational risk', so we may end up migrating to a different platform in the future so we can publish more quickly, we'll see!

[reilly3000]

In our era of deplatforming a publisher publishing on something like Medium seems antithetical, even for a dev team that just wants to get words out. Should you spend some cycles on the dev blog? Probably, but you should also split test the donation copy and get the data warehouse moved forward for 2019 initiatives and fix 1200 other issues. Thanks for sharing a great post. I shared it with my team and we all learned a lot.

[wftglf]

Thanks to hacker news and reddit this piece got over 100,000 page views which should be enough to justify the blog staying on platform!

[AlexCoventry]

Does SecureDrop run on your AWS infrastructure?

[wftglf]

No, I think it's on our own infrastructure.

[AlexCoventry]

Thanks for the info, here and below.

[dmix]

It’s probably better if they didn’t answer this question...

[AlexCoventry]

It's a bit disturbing to me that they seem to be using AWS for confidential editorial work.

> Due to editorial requirements, we needed to run the database cluster and OpsManager on our own infrastructure in AWS rather than using Mongo’s managed database offering.

[wftglf]

In a happy world the guardian wouldn't rely on a company we spend a lot of time reporting on for unethical practices (tax avoidance, worker exploitation etc.) - but we decided it was the only way to compete. One of the big drivers was a denial of service attack on our datacentre in 2014 on boxing day - not an experience any of us want to have to deal with again.

[nexuist]

>Since all our other services are running in AWS, the obvious choice was DynamoDB – Amazon’s NoSQL database offering. Unfortunately at the time Dynamo didn’t support encryption at rest. After waiting around nine months for this feature to be added, we ended up giving up and looking for something else, ultimately choosing to use Postgres on AWS RDS.

[philjohn]

They're using AWS VPC (Virtual Private Cloud) which isn't open to the world (you use a VPN to bridge the VPC into your internal network) and which you can spin up dedicated instances that don't share underlying hardware with other AWS customers.

[pfriend]

Thanks for writing the blog post. Insights like these and of such high quality are rare.

Can I ask what was the total cost of the migration?

If there was software that could do this database migration without downtime, how much would you/Guardian be willing to pay?

[jwdunne]

This is pretty much how all Guardian articles are formatted. Some of their regular pieces could be called "blog posts" - Felicity Cloake's cooking series comes to mind.

Guess it makes sense to reuse the platform that already has the templates than use another platform and reimplement the design.

[vanderZwan]

Given their employers, one would hope that they get good editorial support though!

[pdpi]

Ish. From what I can tell, the “Digital Blog” seems to be set up as just another column on the platform.