[sonnyblarney]

Social Democrats are definitely Socialists. That's fair game.

And if Bernie were Emperor for a while, he'd nationalize a few industries, surely. I can barely imagine would Trump would do if he could just make up the law as well.

[neaden]

Disagree. Bernie doesn't advocate socializing any industries. Even Medicare for All would leave hospitals and doctors as private employees. He isn't going out there saying we should have nationalized the Big Three car companies instead of giving them a bailout, or trying to nationalize the banks, or anything else. He's a social democrat, he wants a strong public safety net tied with private ownership of capital. That's a perfectly fine political position, but it's not socialism.

[danaris]

There's a huge difference between what one advocates as a position as a politician trying to get/stay elected in a two-party democracy, and what they'd be willing to force through if they were all-powerful.

As an example, do you think that, given the ability to enact whatever legal changes he wanted, Bernie Sanders would nationalize our telecommunications infrastructure? Or our health care system?

I don't have any specific, citable reason to think he would, but I think there's plenty of reason to believe they're things he might want to do.

[sonnyblarney]

Social Democrats are essentially socialists, which is why even the Wikipedia entry has it under 'a series on Socialism'.

There's barely a hard line between Democratic Socialism and Social Democrats.

[ileri62]

wat? If they are the same, then why do they have different names? Get a grip. Social democrats have nothing to do with socialists.