[AstralStorm]

Uhmm, it is self organizing as well as transparent. This is why the rule for changing governance rules (including itself) is simple and transparent. To keep relative stability, it has a built in buy in threshold.

There is a difference and fine line between freedom of choice and being overwhelmed by options, especially irrelevant ones, even more so if all competitors are essentially fake and owned by the same company. Looking at Unilever and Nestle here for example.

[AstralStorm]

Why the downvote? It is not like the organization form was thrown onto the project by an external force?

Or does self organizing mean something different from what it says?

[tinus_hn]

> Please don't comment about the voting on comments. It never does any good, and it makes boring reading.