|
|
|
|
|
by simonh
2737 days ago
|
|
Yes, but if we want to distinguish between say asteroids and planets, or orbital pebbles and planets, we need criteria with which to do so and those are going to be at least somewhat arbitrary. The 'cleared it's orbit' thing is also arbitrary. Pluto is sometimes closer to the Sun than Neptune for example but does that mean they share an orbit? It's mainly to exclude Ceres, which is pretty close to spherical. The problem is any rules that exclude Ceres and also exclude the other trans-Plutonian planetoids also end up excluding Pluto. If Pluto is a planet and this new thing, why not Eris, Haumea, Sedna, orcus, etc, etc, etc.There are many dozens of them. We do have applicable terms - planetoid, dwarf planet, so why not use them? |
|
Not really, the degree to which a body has cleared its orbit can be calculated: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clearing_the_neighbourhood
> Pluto is sometimes closer to the Sun than Neptune for example but does that mean they share an orbit?
Pluto is locked in a resonant orbit with Neptune, a position it reached due to the influence of Neptune's gravity:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pluto#Relationship_with_Neptun...