|
|
|
|
|
|
by rattray
2743 days ago
|
|
|
> That all in one factor is probably why it’s a natural complement to .NET. Very much agreed. And I also agree that, at least in a corporate context, training for a React stack would also be expensive, potentially more so. And there are plenty of people out there who have no problem picking up Angular. Looking at job market data alone, though, Angular commands a premium to .NET-only. Anecdotally, folks who feel comfortable with .NET, but who find eg; React+Redux bewildering, also feel constantly confused by Angular and can get themselves into trouble without close guidance. |
|
|
Makes sense, the modern frontend frameworks are pretty similar anyway, despite the amount of noise about their differences. If you find react hard you’ll probably find angular hard and vice versa.