|
|
|
|
|
by acdw
2749 days ago
|
|
This, precisely.
I rent my house right now.
It's a good deal because I don't have to worry about maintenance, property taxes, etc.
But it's only worth it because I rent from someone who only owns a few properties -- he's a small player, so he has time to be responsive to my needs and his other renters' needs.
It's a win-win situation this way. There would be a problem if I rented from a property management corporation.
Just from a logistics standpoint, they simply wouldn't have as many resources to help me when I have maintenance needs on my (really, their) house.
That's ignoring all the other problems that come with concentrated ownership -- the buying of political power, etc. I don't know what the answer is, I wish I did.
Maybe something like what you say, a sort of "specialized" ownership.
I don't know what that would look like though. |
|