|
|
|
|
|
by gknoy
2747 days ago
|
|
Dueling implies that someone who is _better at one thing_ (hurting others) is inherently Right. It also means that someone who is sufficiently good at such things can act as a bully. Dueling introduces personal risk for libelous claims, but it _also_ introduces the same risk for those who are making true claims. People already fear the people that hurt them; giving them a legally supported way of hurting them even more (as a legal "defense") would make people even less likely to report others' bad behavior. Would you challenge someone to a duel, knowing that you're likely to die, even though that person wronged you? Few would take that risk. |
|
#3 Have your seconds meet face to face, negotiate a peace or negotiate a time and place. This is commonplace, ‘specially ‘tween recruits. Most disputes die and no one shoots.
#8 Your last chance to negotiate. Send in your seconds, see if they can set the record straight.