Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by baldfat 2787 days ago
Racket has this for C-based APIs. My mind is kind of wondering how this would ever be stable/maintainable to use for Python, but Lua seems possible but I would rather do my scripting in Racket then Lua and use the C APIs directly.

https://docs.racket-lang.org/foreign/index.html

Looking at Julia (Which has a no "boiler plate" philosophy when using C or Fortan) the function is just called.

Interesting to look at for comparison

Julia ccall- https://docs.julialang.org/en/v0.6.1/manual/calling-c-and-fo...

Racket FFI - https://docs.racket-lang.org/foreign/index.html

2 comments

I am researching julia's code.

https://github.com/JuliaPy/PyCall.jl/blob/master/src/PyCall....

I guess it is like this: Importing the pycall library is to turn on the python interpreter thread and not interrupt it. Then you can call any python library you want.

The GIL is mostly managed by CPython and the host application doesn't touch it directly. Host extension modules may use PyEval_SaveThread et al. just like regular extension modules to release the GIL during blocking operations when called by CPython. There is a separate API for fondling the GIL when you're in a host-created thread (not created by CPython) and want to call CPython. Those are orthogonal (called by CPython vs. calling CPython).
> My mind is kind of wondering how this would ever be stable/maintainable to use for Python

CPython has a stable C API for interacting with the interpreter and Python objects. Presumably FLI goes through this API to interoperate with Python, just like any C/C++ application embedding CPython would.

Edit: Yep, https://github.com/guenchi/FLI/blob/master/pycall.sc

Yes, it embeds the python interpreter into Scheme via C-api.