|
|
|
|
|
by setquk
2749 days ago
|
|
So it's ok for small companies to leak personal data? Doctors' surgeries are small companies here in the UK. The issue here is that literally every company across the world doesn't give a crap past the end of their nose and has abysmal data protection policies in place because it affects the bottom line. They introduced local legislation to help this and a few large fish got fined and that was it. Ultimately it wasn't worth doing anything about it because it wasn't an operational risk. GDPR is about making it a major operational risk to do a shitty job. The rules should be the same for every company and the fines proportional, which they are. The "sheer amount of rules" isn't a lot really and you owe it to your customers. Conclusion: most of the anti-GDPR whiners are worried about spending on data protection and training because it hurts the bottom line. Change my mind? |
|
The GDPR doesn't just require companies not to leak personal data, it's a huge complex regulatory framework designed to handle the megacorps it was passed to target and imposes unnecessarily high compliance costs, and those costs disproportionately affect smaller entities.
In particular, it is possible to have perfectly sound data protection practices that would never lead to leaking personal data, while still not being in compliance because they're not the specific ones required.
These specific unnecessarily complex rules or total anarchy is a false dichotomy.