Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by jgh 2748 days ago
LOL this is such a typical HN reply. "Just get room mates". Come on, the solution is to pay people so they can live a decent life and have a family if they want to.
3 comments

Why would it be my employers obligation to pay me what I think I need because I want luxuries (like a $1600 apartment by myself)?

The typical HN reply may be trying to help figure out a problem like “if I only have X dollars how can I maximize.”

Reality is that unskilled labor doesn’t get everything they want. Fortunately, they get everything they need. A better example would be healthcare, but I think Amazon’s fulfillment center workers have pretty good insurance.

Its a luxury to live without 2 roommates? I mean, I guess they won't die if that's what you mean.
Yes. Definitely. It’s not essential. And it costs more.

It’s not a Rolex, but I was pretty happy when I was finally able to live alone.

I was thinking in terms of Maslow [0] as it’s somewhere, I think, around esteem.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maslow%27s_hierarchy_of_needs

We are not morally obligated to ensure that every single entry-level, unskilled job pays enough for a middle class lifestyle, regardless of mistakes made prior.

The solution is to not work long-term in an entry-level, unskilled job.

> Come on, the solution is to pay people so they can live a decent life and have a family if they want to.

That's not up for a company to decide, they don't control all the prices and sentiments that determine what is and isn't "decent to live". They can decide what they can pay to hire an extra worker and make more money as a result. If they don't believe they'll make more money as a result, then there's no hire.

Then capitalism has failed humanity.
I’m really interested in what you think the job of market systems is. And to whom they are trying to serve.

It seems odd that capitalism would have such a duty to humanity because it’s like saying “art has failed humanity.” Or “this screwdriver has failed breakfast.”

What exactly is captitalism serving if not the intersts of humans?
Capitalism is a system created by humans, presumably for the benefit of humans. If it doesn't do a very good job of making the lives of humans better then it could be considered a failure.

As we're seeing now, wealth and income inequality are at terrible levels. Wage stagnation has been hurting the middle class. Housing is becoming increasingly expensive as jobs centralize on cities. Gentrification pushes out the working class.

We have climate change bearing down on us, the effects of which are already being seen through mass migration, fires, hurricanes, and other disasters. Meanwhile the fossil fuel industry would have us believe there are "two sides" to this argument so that they can continue to profit instead of adapting and doing the right thing. The first to feel it certainly won't be those of us making several hundred thousand dollars per year and looking down on those living paycheck to paycheck. It'll be those living paycheck to paycheck who feel it first.

Neither artists nor bartenders have the power over humanity that capitalists do.

> Neither artists nor bartenders have the power over humanity that capitalists do.

With great power comes great responsibility. This is precisely why we must hold capitalists accountable.