|
|
|
|
|
by XCabbage
2740 days ago
|
|
I think your interpretation is correct. In particular, I think that your first two quotes from the text are saying that the "personal or household" user themselves has no obligations under the GDPR. It's coherent to include social networking in here; without that clause, a child writing on Facebook about how another child smells bad would presumably themselves be a data controller and subject to an erasure request, whereas with the clause, Facebook can be compelled by a regulator to remove the post but the child who posted it cannot. Or at least that's my interpretation. Like you, I remain uncertain and troubled. |
|