|
|
|
|
|
by noobly
2751 days ago
|
|
is there really a naming distinction between ‘>’ and ‘<‘? Is only one really the ‘greater’ than sign? Interesting if so! I always assumed it was context dependent (i.e x < 10 could be said 10 is greater than x, so it’s still acting as a greater than sign - but I see why I’m probably wrong here). I was interested in seeing an arguement like another poster made, where notation be like x = [0,1] might be proposed. |
|
Also, Unicode calls it U+003C LESS-THAN SIGN and U+003E GREATER-THAN SIGN.
At least, that's the terms that the article is using, and I think there's sufficient context to identify that, and go along w/ it.