| > The comment you are replying to clearly says that unjustified police brutality should be punished at the full extent of the law. Yeah, and you still leave it open whether it might be "justified", it goes on to say "When you have police being attacked from all sides and you intend no harm". Which prompted the following question you seem to avoided: > Oh, so they didn't means you can deduce they "meant to cause harm", and that in turn excuses the harm we see? So you think "unjustified police brutality" should be punished, (by the full extent of the law no less, how very generous and princpliped!), but you still leave this on the table: > People getting their ass beat for trying to set fire to a McDonalds while protesting the high cost of living deserve no tears, I'm sorry. > If you're convinced France is a totalitarian state your ability to reason is probably quite limited. That's a total non-sequitur. Right now, you're not even up to speed on the meaning of your own comments heh, no need to insult me to distract from that. I'm not talking to France as a nation, I'm talking to you. If you think you can just handwave a bit and play sophistry games and call me stupid you're mistaken. |