Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by onhn 2756 days ago
There is a good reason: we should not be passing judgement on the validity of scientific work based on informal discussions.
1 comments

Disagree. As just one example, the Solvay conferences of the 1910s-20s. Much of QM was developed by informal discussions, both written and verbal.

Likewise, most of the initial challenges to scientific papers/theories/experimental results happens informally and only later will there be a peer reviewed counter (if the original has not between withdrawn or modified before). Reference the OPERA ftl neutrinos for a recent example.