|
|
|
|
|
by scottlocklin
2756 days ago
|
|
Your point being? Point and sputter isn't much of an argument, even with great goblins like the ones you mention above. Franco by any sane measure, was a much lesser goblin. As was his next door neighbor Salazar. For their times, and particularly considering their situations, they were fairly reasonable leaders. Which is probably why they were integrated into NATO. |
|
They were integrated into NATO for the same reason that FulgĂȘncio Batista was propped up by the US, or the Iranian Shah, or the guy that overthrew Jacobo Arbenz. That reason is: the US benefited economically and militarily from that situation, and any other considerations (moral, ethical, the well-being of the people, whether it was democratic) simply did not enter the equation one way or the other. Who cares if Arbenz was democratically elected and his land reforms lifted millions out of poverty, the United Fruit Company was making less money for their owners after some inhumane exploitation was outlawed so in comes the US coup, etc etc.
You simply cannot argue morality or democracy when discussing this.