This also extends to which incidents of police violence are approved and covered or not. If circumstances were different we might see cries of authoritarianism and calls for regime change!
Exactly, they'd be decrying the use of “chemicals weapons” by police (i.e. tear gas/pepper spray) and ask if it violates treaties against its use on civilians, etc. It’s all so blatantly political and partisan by a group which sets itself up as paragon of impartiality, truth, etc., but it’s all about world view, power and exerting that power to project that world view.
Now of course editorials and editorializing _is_ understandably different but unfortunately that wall has been completely breached and demolished.
Now of course editorials and editorializing _is_ understandably different but unfortunately that wall has been completely breached and demolished.