|
|
|
|
|
by bad_user
2750 days ago
|
|
I'm not talking about what's interesting or not in the universe. I'm saying that compatibilism basically says that rocks too have free will. Which makes the term meaningless. I mean, if you think about it, rocks too can suffer grinding due to their environment, having their shape, size or texture changed, which will affect what "choices" they'll make in the future and all rocks are unique in the universe due to their shape, composition and location. So in regards to a "free will" discussion, the only difference between us and rocks is what? That we are living organisms and thus can move around? So is an amoeba. |
|
No, it's that we perceive our time-line-uniqueness as will (consciously) whereas rocks don't.