|
|
|
|
|
by kbenson
2760 days ago
|
|
Steam[1] still has more peak concurrent users than Fortnite at 14 million if you add the games up, while Fortnite is over 8 million[2]. Fortnite does have a huge install base, but I imagine most of them that need a store (i.e. not consoles, so basically PCs) already have Steam, and at least one game in it. For new users that don't have steam, there might be an inventive to use the Epic games launcher, especially if there's a discount, but having games split across two systems is really annoying (but it's not too bad for one game), so I imagine without an incentive most existing Steam users will opt out, thus preserving Steam's dominance. 1: https://store.steampowered.com/stats/ 2: https://thenextweb.com/gaming/2018/11/08/fortnites-concurren... |
|
125 million fortnite installs - https://www.businessinsider.com/fortnite-size-statistics-pla...
70+ million steam installs - https://galyonk.in/steam-in-2017-129c0e6be260
Not saying what's right and what's wrong but I heard these kind of numbers reported after the announcement. I see a lot of different numbers being thrown around and I'm not sure what to believe anymore.
Steamcharts consistently surprises me at how few people play the popular games I like, so I'm beginning to think Steam isn't as big.