Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by sho 2758 days ago
Not sure if you are being sarcastic, but if testing on your browser means downloading a 4GB+ image every couple months and having it take up all my memory in a clunky VM and messing around with how it gets its IP and then trying to update itself with another multi-gigabyte windows update while I'm tethering and did I mention you have to redo it all every couple of months?... then I'm not testing against your browser.
3 comments

Then how are you testing your browser? Are you assuming that testing Chrome on ThisOS is sufficient testing for Chrome on EveryOtherOS?
One thing is testing if the fancy custom react component works properly in a particular browser at all, that should be the case in a certain browser+version across OSes and you'd want that available all the time.

The other thing is testing if some CSS is acting up in a specific Browser/Browserversion/OS/Screensize/Phone combination; that is probably a job for QA.

There is also http://saucelabs.com/ and https://www.browserstack.com/ who have real devices and allow you to run automated tests.
> and messing around with how it gets its IP

Standard VirtualBox is either bridged or NAT, never had a problem there.

> and then trying to update itself with another multi-gigabyte windows update

Now THAT one is a real problem. MS to this day didn't bother to release a Service Pack 2 for W7.