Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by cheez 2754 days ago
> They were able to stop paying a third employee when they went to Steam. That's a lot of value to the business.

They were able to stop paying? Doesn't that mean they make less money?

1 comments

Revenue is fairly useless it’s profit that you care about. Having less employees also means less effort managing them.
Ah I see.
They also made more money, even with Steam's cut.

People are expensive. (Hence the whole "oncoming economic doom" thing.)