[tialaramex]

Voice is in a way the easy case, because we know the antidote. Constant Bitrate (CBR) mode of an audio codec consumes the same amount of bandwidth regardless of what is transmitted, which is inefficient but secure. As I understand it Signal's voice chat is Opus in CBR mode.

Other scenarios are trickier and may need custom work. For example Encrypted SNI currently requires a host to pick a maximum name length, the encrypted name may be any of those names configured on the host, and is padded to that length so that an adversary can't guess which name from the length.

Because we don't have a general solution, TLS 1.3 defines an zero overhead optional padding, you can add extra bytes of padding to any TLS message but neither TLS itself, nor the HTTPS binding defines a "good" way to use this padding to shield users from analysis of content based on size because there is no general solution known.