[PavlovsCat]

2 downvotes in 45 minutes on a discussion that's at place 44 on page 2? Hah. Instead, actually answer. The top comment states:

> It's hard to trust a paper you've published on the impact of #MeToo when your department is literally rewarding the founders.

Which does raise the questions

> why would an engineer write a "paper on the impact of #MeToo" that anyone would need to "trust" purely on the engineering experience of the author?

and

> what would a paper on "the impact of metoo" by an engineer even look like

I didn't post that up top precisely because I didn't want to trigger silent downvotes. But some apparently can't even leave something that is at the bottom be. Well, if it's so horrible, let's actually hear it. Anyone who asks anyone to have a opinion on a thing, or downvotes someone for asking what that thing is, should at least have a mental model of said thing they can explain to others. So do that.