|
|
|
|
|
|
by ivanstojic
5704 days ago
|
|
|
Let me get this straight... - You want indefinite time to test a product which is loosely specified, effectively leaving developers of good solutions screwed if someone posts a better solution in the meanwhile
- Yet you want everyone to rush on it because only the first accepted solution gets paid for, and
- You actually you want them to invent wheels, hot water and sliced bread (no frameworks) To add insult to injury, you want to protect yourself from people who want to earn quick money, while treating developers as a potential source of double licensing and nasty gotchas. Or did I misunderstand you? |
|
|
Apparently, yes.
Nobody needs to rush, it is just that I think it is only fair that if someone completes the job they get paid and I only need one implementation, not 10. So I encourage people to collaborate rather than to work independently, but they're free to do so if they want.
That's also why I offer to list contact info for those busy on the project.
I want to protect myself from people who just go for the cash without any basic q&a because it will mean that a serious contender will not get a fair chance.