|
|
|
|
|
by chii
2759 days ago
|
|
But those employees who _did not_ care about morality also would have their stock decrease by 10% in value due to no fault of their own. Therefore, it's only ethically correct for those who want to take the stance to also accept a decrease in stock compared to those who didnt. |
|
Or is it "all privilege, no responsibility"?