|
|
|
|
|
by YorkshireSeason
2759 days ago
|
|
That's a really interesting perspective.
For what it's worth, that's a modern variant of Marx & Engels argument against equality (opportunity or outcome). They say equality is a bourgeois tool to deal with capitalism's shortcomings. They stipulated that there will be no equality (neither of opportunity nor of outcome) in a communist society, and that that was a great thing. Instead of equality (opportunity or outcome) they suggested "From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs" [1].The idea behind this line of thought is that equality matters only if you don't have enough, but communist society will provide so much surplus that envy simply disappears, and equality withers. It is interesting to ponder the correctness of this line of thought, e.g. do the slim in the rich world envy the obese, despite the latter consuming more food?
Traces of this argument go back to Aristotle. Marx & Engels erred in that they assumed capitalist modes of production cannot produce vast amounts of surplus. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/From_each_according_to_his_abi... |
|