|
|
|
|
|
|
by propa
2762 days ago
|
|
|
Earlier in the thread you suggested that it's hard to justify ncdu using 60MB while it takes only 3.5MB to store 400K * 8 bytes numbers. The number you came up with is just silly and overlooks actual complexity of the problem. Given that you are making an implicit judgement about the other program, don't be sloppy with your estimates. |
|
|
I'm not. You can, and I'm sure eventually you will arrive very close to the approximation.
I'd been a big time fan of `ncdu` for years and even wrote in an e-journal about it once. Maybe that's why the sharp adjectives became more difficult to digest. Anyway, good luck!