|
|
|
|
|
|
by ssadler
2771 days ago
|
|
|
We have a technical method to do so, but the site has not been created, that I know of. For example: * A domain name like ipfs://nytimesmirror.com that mirrors nytimes articles (at the same relative URLs)
* Some kind of crowdsourced process for content curation. I'm aware that it's not legal, but I wouldn't be against it. Content piracy has been a catalyst for change. I simultaneously would be willing to pay nytimes for access to their content but I'm not willing to sign up to a $15 / month subscription. So if their content was widely pirated using delivery method like IPFS they might be incentivized to problem solve that for me. |
|
|
Yet paying for content has been a catalyst for...content.
> they might be incentivized to problem solve that for me.
What is that even supposed to mean?