|
|
|
|
|
|
by trash_panda
2759 days ago
|
|
|
Not only do they not address the technical aspects of the paper, their response starts with a direct personal attack: "It seems Nadim (the author of this paper) took it really badly when we called him out for intentionally spreading fake news this weekend." [1] That's really low. The beautiful thing about computers is that we can prove each others right or wrong with technical arguments. If ProtonMail thinks Nadim has a personal grudge against them, wouldn't it be beautiful for them to disprove him with another professionally written paper as Nadim did? They can't. Also, I think Nadim knows more than anyone the dangers of pushing weak products and marketing them as secure. It happened to him with Cryptocat. It's a thing that can harm reputation and also harm users, Nadim went through that and I believe he has good intentions by presenting this paper. --- [1] https://www.reddit.com/r/ProtonMail/comments/9yqxkh/an_analy... |
|
|