|
|
|
|
|
|
by pas
2764 days ago
|
|
|
> it might be a defining feature of intelligence. But if not, and the alarmists are right, deep shit. That's why the author's argument is void. The author needs to show that the chance of an AI with a simple goal and hyperintelligence is negligible. "it might be" is a coin toss, that doesn't help. |
|
|