Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by martokus 2766 days ago
They say they are not changing the "things to do" pages as they for people close to booking. I actually think they are for people that have already booked - I have a trip to Geneva coming in 1 week, let's plan my days...

Also I feel that in the travel industry people have their favourite website where they ultimately go to purchase and TripAdvisor is just not one of those. Anyone I know of thinks of it as helpful travel advice, not a booking engine. People find hotels on Booking.com, look them up on TripAdvisor, book on Booking.com.

2 comments

I look up hotels on booking.com and TripAdvisor and then head to the hotel’s own website to make the booking.
Same here. Also, often if you call the hotel they'll offer you a better deal as they don't have to pay the big booking agencies.
Every time I've called a hotel they have offered me a more expensive rate, so now I don't.
I've had good experiences with calling, but I upvoted anyway because I do believe there are hotels that are stuck in their ways and have no flexibility to offer a better rate to someone who is trying to price-match booking.com.
I've found this hit and miss. Which I'm surprises by since they save 30% if I book direct
People who call might be less likely to shop around, since calling is a pain.
More like 12-18% with booking.com.
I've been using HotelTonight a lot as it lets me pick a date I might want to go somewhere and it sends me updates on decent hotels as the price goes down. But I use TripAdvisor to check first if it's a good spot to stay.
I do the same except for a short diversion via Google maps reviews (because I find these are the closest to reality you can ever find).
I tend to use TripAdvisor to explore possible hotels in a location. However, the really annoying modal dialog that pops up to insist that you enter booking dates when looking at hotels on TripAdvisor is starting to make me look elsewhere.

95% of the time I use TripAdvisor I'm not booking anything - I'm just looking.