[smt88]

Tobacco has killed more people so far. Facebook accepted a lot of money to help Trump win, so if he were to start a war or something, I think the blood would also be on Facebook's hands. Climate change is a whole other issue with him, though less direct.

Also, I understand the headline to be a comparison of tactics, not of harm.

And as for the share button, writers don't make their site's templates.

[dontreact]

Facebook accepted more money from the Clinton campaign though right?

[smt88]

If she had won, people gave her FB strategy (and Russia) credit for her victory, and she started a war, I'd say the same thing about her.

Helping a politician who ends up killing people is arguably helping to kill those people, whether you're a voter or an ad firm or IBM in the 40s.

[dontreact]

“People gave credit for”

What should the standard of proof be for accusing an organization of “helping to kill”? Have we met that with Facebook?